But I can see why she did it.
When you’ve lost someone close to you – especially suddenly – it’s natural to think about what you’d say if you could just see them one more time. My dad took his life when I was five years old, and I’ve thought a million times about conversations I’d have loved to have with him. As a technologist, I’ve thought of ways tech could make this happen, such as by using photos and videos of him as training material for an AI .
Download the new Independent Premium app
Sharing the full story, not just the headlines
Meeting my dad in virtual reality would, of course, not be the same as seeing him in the flesh (which isn’t possible – yet?). But technology has already advanced to the point that we can create very convincing “deepfakes ”, and recreating someone’s presence in virtual reality isn’t much more advanced than that. Like it or not, reuniting with our dead loved ones is likely to become a commercially-available service in the next few years – and in the meantime, we need to prepare ourselves for the emotional implications.
The VFX-1. We can’t do a list about the history of Virtual Reality and not include the VFX-1. Released in the middle of the 1990s, the VFX-1 system was one of the most capable virtual reality headsets released on the market at the time. With stereoscopic 3D, multi-axis head movement detection and rotation, and the ability to play games that were not truly supported by the system, the VFX-1 was the true Virtual Reality deal at the time. Furthermore, their price tag was relatively cheap compared to other products on the market, coming at a mere $600. However, the VFX-1 was too advanced of a technology and it didn’t really take off. Later on, the company Vuzix that made the glasses was bought by Forte Technologies, which released a more expensive VFX 3D version, but it also didn’t manage to achieve huge success.
There’ll be a lot of them. For instance, what if the dead person’s avatar isn’t quite right? What if it’s too cartoony, the voice is wrong, or it walks into a piece of furniture and glitches? How will the bereaved brain cope with something that looks like their loved one, but is ever so slightly off? Someone still grieving could easily enter a dangerous spiral from something as simple as a bug in the software.
Equally, those providing the simulation are unlikely to be doing it out of the goodness of their hearts. What if you’re in the middle of a painful conversation with your late family member, and the VR headset gets switched off because it’s someone else’s turn? What if, in order to afford a session, you have to put up with your dead child spouting advertising messages every fifteen minutes? What if a hacker gets into the system and makes your loved one say abhorrent things to you? Can any kind of therapy undo that kind of emotional damage?
Finally, mixed reality, the newest of the realities, is known as the “merging of the physical world and the virtual world, creating an environment where real-life items and holographic items coexist, in the same space and at the same time.” Although all three of these technologies are vastly different, it is easy to see how companies can use the wrong technology when trying to reach consumers.
Of course, heartbroken humans already have other ways to rediscover their dead. I’ve had countless dreams about seeing my dad again, and it could be argued that virtual reality is essentially the same, only with better graphics. Isn’t it only fair that people who don’t or can’t dream of their loved ones can connect with them another way?
Well, no. For starters, your dreams are likely to be hazy, pulled directly from your own memories. An AI trying to approximate your grandma from a limited database of video recordings might get it wrong, and overwrite your real memories in the process. Did she always sound slightly autotuned? Was she always so short with you?
iGlasses. While today Apple is infamous for their use of “i” in their products, they weren’t the first ones to come up with the idea. In the 1990s, a company known as Virtual I/O came up with a headset that was capable of color 3D stereoscopic vision, as well as head tracking. Known as iGlasses, the device had a price tag of just under $1000. While the glasses were fully capable of delivering an immersive experience, they didn’t truly ignite the consumer market.
That’s not to say the idea has no merit at all. I’ve had extensive therapy for my dad’s death, and some of the exercises involved things like talking to an empty chair that I imagined was him, or to a photo, or envisioning going back in time to revisit the scenes of happy memories. Some of those exercises were helpful, and enabled me to move a little further forward.
Perhaps hearing my dad say “I love you, I miss you, it wasn’t your fault” in his own voice would give the closure that imagine those words has never achieved. When a male radio producer read my dad’s suicide note aloud, it affected me completely differently, even though I’d read the words in my head a thousand times.
Still, if VR grief therapy is going to be helpful and not hurtful, it will need to be available under supervision, and not all the time. If there was a box in the corner of my living room with a version of my dad inside, I can’t say I wouldn’t be tempted to go and live in that fantasy and neglect my real life – and I’m relatively well-recovered. Someone bereaved last week might well waste away in a pixelated world where they and their lost loved one could be “together”.
The VR Today. Currently Virtual Reality is growing in popularity and while companies like the Oculus Rift are losing some of their customers because of unpopular marketing practices, other devices, including the HTC Vive are taking the VR stage. Furthermore, with Google Cardboard creating the concept and other companies taking note, Smartphone Virtual Reality Goggles are letting consumers easily enjoy and experience immersive virtual and augmented reality. With huge consumer base, the multiple platforms for development, and the lack of many VR games and experiences, small start-ups as well as huge companies are investing huge amounts of money into the development of content for Virtual Reality, which might very well help VR finally achieve the world-wide recognition it didn’t manage to achieve on the market for years.
As with everything tech, the difference that virtually reanimating the dead makes to the human world depends entirely on how it’s implemented. Meeting a version of your child controlled by a trained therapist as a way to help you to heal could be a gift, whereas meeting one controlled by Facebook as a way to keep you engaged with the platform could be a curse. I suspect there’ll be some of both, so it’s up to us what kinds of virtual worlds we create. Just make sure that before you enter, you’ve thought about what lies ahead.